Dia Spectr
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Inzucchi, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Inzucchi, S. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Diabetes Spectrum 18:188-191, 2005
© American Diabetes Association ®, Inc., 2005


Special Report

Clinical Results of an Updated Insulin Infusion Protocol in Critically Ill Patients

Philip A. Goldberg, MD, Maureen G. Roussel, APRN, MSN and Silvio E. Inzucchi, MD

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Strict glycemic control has recently been shown to improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. In the February 2004 issue of Diabetes Care, we reported our early experience implementing an insulin infusion protocol (IIP) in a medical intensive care unit (MICU).1 To facilitate early acceptance by our critical care physicians and nurses, we initially selected a conservative blood glucose target of 100–139 mg/dl. We subsequently published similar (indeed, slightly better) results using this same IIP in two cardiothoracic intensive units (CTICUs).2

Following this work, based on the primary literature,3 a position statement from the American College of Endocrinology (ACE),4 and a technical review by the American Diabetes Association (ADA),5 we decided to lower our target further into the normal range. Rather than abruptly drop to the 80–110 mg/dl target espoused by both the ACE and ADA, we elected to gradually lower our blood glucose target range in order to carefully study the impact of lowering the target on both glycemic control and rates of hypoglycemia.

To this end, we present here our updated experience with a new, more stringent IIP, which differs from our old protocol in three fundamental ways:

  1. Target blood glucose levels are lowered to 90–119 mg/dl,
  2. To facilitate more rapid glycemic control, the initial insulin bolus is increased by ~ 40%, and,
  3. The protocol language is now in compliance with the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

The complete, updated IIP is shown in Figure 1.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The new Yale IIP.

 
We first studied 54 consecutive patients receiving intravenous (IV) insulin in our CTICU, who, because of their typically brief lengths of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
S. G. Oeyen, E. A. Hoste, C. D. Roosens, J. M. Decruyenaere, and S. I. Blot
Adherence to and Efficacy and Safety of an Insulin Protocol in the Critically Ill: A Prospective Observational Study
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2007; 16(6): 599 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association.