Diabetes Spectrum 19:5-11, 2006
© American Diabetes Association ®, Inc., 2006
Motivational Interviewing and Diabetes: What Is It, How Is It Used, and Does It Work?
Garry Welch, PhD,
Gary Rose, PhD and
Denise Ernst, MA
| The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Motivational interviewing (MI) has recently become a topic of great
interest in the diabetes behavioral field, having been the focus of workshops
and research presentations at national meetings such as the Society of
Behavioral Medicine, the American Diabetes Association, the North American
Association for the Study of Obesity, and the Behavioral Research in Diabetes
Exchange. The Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) was founded
in 1995 and sponsors a website
(www.motivationalinterviewing.org)
through which MI trainers and researchers share information and ideas. This
site provides information, research findings, and training opportunities and
is a good starting point for further exploration of MI.
According to Miller and
Rollnick,1 MI has
been applied to the management of a wide range of target behaviors, including
addictive behaviors, HIV risk reduction, eating disorders, criminal justice
case management, fruit and vegetable intake, exercise, and major psychiatric
disorders.
MI is a coherent, teachable, evidence-based approach to behavior change
counseling that serves as an amalgam of philosophies, principles, and
techniques drawn from several existing models of psychotherapy and health
behavior change
theory.2 For
example, its patient-centered approach and focus on empathy and strong
reflective listening skills are principally drawn from the client-centered
therapy of Carl Rogers and his belief in the "force of life," the
natural self-actualizing tendency of healthy
people.3 Other
theoretical influences include Bem's Self-Perception
Theory,4 Janis and
Mann's Decisional Balance
Theory,5 and the
Transtheoretical Model of Prochaska et
al.6 The handbook
Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for
Change1
provides more detail for those interested in the theoretical underpinnings of
MI.
Hettema et al.7
have cogently reported on the emerging theory of how MI affects behavior
change. They reviewed evidence suggesting that practitioners who practice MI
elicit increased levels of verbalization in support of change, known as
"change talk," and decreased utterances of resistance. Both . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 |
Key Elements of MI
|
|---|
 |
Spirit of MI
|
|---|
 |
Understanding Ambivalence
|
|---|
 |
Exchanging Information
|
|---|
Agenda-setting: opening the door The importance-confidence ruler
 |
What the Research Shows
|
|---|
 |
MI Training With Diabetes Educators
|
|---|
 |
Conclusions
|
|---|

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Deangelis
Patient Empowerment Improves Outcomes
DOC News,
December 1, 2007;
4(12):
1 - 13.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. N. Davison
Facilitating Advance Care Planning for Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: The Patient Perspective
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
September 1, 2006;
1(5):
1023 - 1028.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
|