HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Slocum, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Slocum, J. M. Related Collections Related Articles Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Preconception Counseling and Type 2 Diabetes

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

	Introduction

 
Editor's note: This is the first article in our newly revamped "Evidence-Based Clinical Decision Making" department. For more information about our new format and its rationale, please see the editorial on p. 69 of this issue.

	Background and Clinical Problem: Preconception Counseling

 
Diabetes has been associated with pregnancy-related complications.^1,2 Rates of spontaneous abortion and perinatal mortality and the incidence of congenital anomalies in offspring of women with diabetes remain significantly higher than that of the background population. It is well accepted that achieving a level of glycemic control comparable to the nondiabetic population can decrease the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The American Diabetes Association (ADA)¹ and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists² both recommend preconception counseling (PC) for all women with diabetes who have child-bearing potential.

The ADA¹ recommends that PC include the risks of congenital malformations associated with poor metabolic control and the use of effective contraception unless the woman is in good metabolic control. The goal for glycemic management is to obtain the lowest possible hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) level without undue risk of hypoglycemia, preferably an A1C that is < 1% above the normal range. It is also recommended that providers identify and treat complications of diabetes, such as nephropathy, retinopathy, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and neuropathy, before conception.³

The majority of women with diabetes, however, do not obtain PC and continue to have unplanned pregnancies. The majority of studies (Table 1)^4,5,7–19 report that up to 62% of women with type 1 diabetes received PC, whereas < 36% of women with type 2 diabetes received PC. In studies by Gunton et al.,^4,5 the rate of women with type 1 diabetes having received PC improved significantly over time (from 18.9 to 62.5%), but a downward trend was noted in the rate for women with type 2 diabetes (from 52.6 to 36.4%). . . . [Full Text of this Article]

	Case Study

 

	Clinical Question

 

	PICO Format

 

	Search Strategy

 

	Results and Critical Appraisal

 

	Summary and Evidence Grading System for Clinical Practice Recommendations

 

	Case Study Revisited

 

	Clinical Question Revisited

 

	Implications for Practice

 

CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles:

Evidence-Based Clinical Decision Making: A Framework to Guide Clinical Practice (Exemplar: Preconception Counseling)

Denise Charron-Prochownik
Diabetes Spectr 2007 20: 69-70. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]