© American Diabetes Association ®, Inc., 2002
Diabetes Bars and Beverages: The Benefits and the Controversies
The couple in the advertisement, a pair of retirees, is enjoying a vigorous outing on the beach. They walk briskly through the surf as waves roll in over their feet. We find out that the couple faces having diabetes. However, they use a special food product the ad tells us is "designed for people with diabetes." The product helps them control their blood glucose and maintain optimal health. The scene is hopeful and reassuring that, with the help of this product, it is possible to have good diabetes control, look good, and feel great and to do so without an overwhelming amount of effort. This ad was no doubt produced to capture the attention of the burgeoning market of individuals with diabetes16 million adults in the United States.1 Through visual suggestion, the ad offers an important message about positive lifestyle choices, such as doing moderate physical activity, eating right, maintaining a healthy weight, managing stress, and enjoying life. However, at the end of the scene, a significant oversight becomes obvious. When the waves wash back, we see the couple, otherwise seemingly doing things right, walking along barefooted, thereby leaving themselves vulnerable to potentially undesirable consequences. The food item advertised is one of a growing number of products known as "functional" or "medical" foods that are formulated to address the nutrition concerns of people with diabetes or abnormal glucose tolerance. These products, in the form of beverages and snack bars, are developed to meet societys demand for convenience, portability, and good taste. At the same time, they are promoted as healthy foods that help people with diabetes manage their disease by improving glycemic control and lowering risk factors for long-term complications, especially cardiovascular disease. This article offers information about currently available diabetes bars and beverages, the research that has driven their development, and the important role that diabetes care providers play in guiding their patients toward the appropriate use of these products. Many of the diabetes medical foods entering the marketplace are modified, enhanced, fortified, or supplemented in order to confront diabetes from a number of directions. The challenge is to evaluate each of these products and assess the contribution each makes to patients overall nutrient intake. The goal should be to offer patients guidance about how they may integrate these products into an eating plan that achieves their goals for diabetes medical nutrition therapy.2,3 In the end, we want to avoid an oversight that could, from a nutritional standpoint, expose bare feet.
The complex formulation of the diabetes bars and beverages on the market responds to the mounting evidence that certain nutrients and physiologically active food components play a role in improving glycemic control and reducing risk factors for development of diabetes complications. Functional features in these products include resistant starch and added fiber; fortification with vitamins and mineralsspecifically, notably high amounts of the antioxidant vitamins C and E and chromium; and the use of soy. Some products manipulate the percentages of the macronutrients carbohydrate, protein, and fat, while others incorporate herbal and other nontraditional remedies. (See Tables 1 and 2.)
In evaluating each product, it is important to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support its purported role in diabetes management and whether the inclusion of a functional feature is truly efficacious.
Resistant starch and soluble fiber Resistant starch is a carbohydrate source that requires special consideration. It withstands breakdown by digestive enzymes and thus is digested and absorbed at a slow and sustained rate. This results in a coinciding low postprandial blood glucose peak and a continued slow release of glucose into the bloodstream for several hours.4,5 Consequently, resistant starch, either in the form of uncooked cornstarch or produced through food processing, is a key functional feature of diabetes bars and beverages. Other benefits include a lowering of insulin response and improvement in insulin efficiency in the postprandial phase, an improvement in lipid metabolism as evidenced by lower LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and improvements in fibrinolytic capacity.68 Because products that contain resistant starch, especially uncooked cornstarch, lead to a slow release of glucose into the blood-stream, they may help prevent hypoglycemia when incorporated into a nighttime snack or consumed as a pre-exercise carbohydrate source.9 Fiber fortification, especially with viscous water-soluble fiber, is another feature of diabetes bars and beverages. Water-soluble fiber delays transit time through the stomach and small intestine, and fiber viscosity slows the transit of chyme through the intestinal tract. This slows absorption rates and lowers blood concentrations of nutrients postprandially.10
High-fiber diets have been shown to lower postmeal blood glucose rise, improve insulin sensitivity, and reduce hyperinsulinemia,1012 to reduce total cholesterol by Although all individuals, including those with diabetes, are encouraged to consume 2035 g/day of fiber from both soluble and insoluble sources,3 average daily fiber intake among Americans is only about 1415 g.13 Individuals who have restricted calorie intakes may be especially vulnerable to an inadequate fiber intake. Although we must encourage consumption of a variety of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, supplemental foods can be additional fiber sources.
Protein and fat Fat is added to those diabetes bars that are formulated to prevent hypoglycemia because fat delays gastric emptying, slows the absorption of carbohydrate, and therefore delays the postprandial blood glucose peak. Because fat extends the nutrient absorption time and entrance into the bloodstream as glucose, its role in these products is to lower the risk of hypoglycemia.9 The ideal dietary protein mix is much debated, in part because of the influence of the once-again-popular low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet trend. Nutrition recommendations for people with diabetes advise that 1020% of daily calories should come from protein.3 The percentage of protein in some bars designed for people with diabetes is as high as 30% of calories, whereas carbohydrate provides only 40% of calories in these products. The high-protein formulation is based on the popular claims that protein has a low glycemic index, prevents high glucose excursions, decreases insulin levels, reduces fat storage, reduces hunger, and improves weight-loss success and glycemic control. These claims are very controversial and are of questionable accuracy.15 Soy protein, which is added to some products, is associated with a beneficial and significant lowering of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides without affecting HDL cholesterol.11,2 Protein serves another functional purpose in diabetes bars formulated to prevent hypoglycemia. It is added to these products based on the notion that it is converted to glucose and released into the bloodstream 2.55 h after it is consumed.9 Protein, therefore, contributes to a delayed postprandial blood glucose peak and may help prevent nighttime or exercise-related hypoglycemia.9 The degree to which protein is converted to glucose in the blood and the role that it plays in preventing hypoglycemia is another highly debated topic.15
Vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants Considerable evidence suggests that oxidative processes are involved in the development of atherosclerotic diseases, and that antioxidants, especially vitamin E, play a role in lowering disease risk.11,1618 Chromium supplementation is gaining popularity as its potential to improve insulin action, improve fasting and postprandial blood glucose, and reduce blood lipids gains acceptance.18,19 B vitamins, especially folic acid, are recognized to play a role in reducing homocysteine levels and may be beneficial in the prevention and treatment of vascular complications of diabetes,11,18 Because there is much research bringing good news about the benefits of these nutrients, they are popular additions to functional foods. However, the potential for excess intake certainly exists. Diabetes bars and beverages can potentially contribute significant amounts of these nutrients to the total daily intake. Individuals with diabetes, either on their own or by advice of their physician, may also be supplementing these same vitamins and minerals in addition to consuming other highly fortified foods. Diabetes care providers must carefully assess total micronutrient intake from supplemental products in addition to the amounts taken in from all other sources to ensure that total intake is adequate but not above tolerable upper intake levels (UL).20 Interestingly, with the exception of folic acid, neither the American Diabetes Association, the American Dietetic Association, nor the American Heart Association support routine supplementation or fortification of these micronutrients. Rather, they encourage consuming a varied diet that includes plenty of plant foods.11,20
Given the potential benefits and possible controversies surrounding diabetes medical foods, what advice should we offer individuals with diabetes about using these products?
Charlotte Hayes, MMSc, RD, LD, CDE, is a diabetes nutrition and exercise specialist in Atlanta, Ga.
2 Thomson C, Bloch AS, Hasler CM: Position of the American Dietetic Association: functional foods. J Am Diet Assoc 99:12781285, 1999[Medline] 3 American Diabetes Association: Nutrition recommendations and principles for people with diabetes mellitus (Position Statement). Diabetes Care 24 (Suppl. 1):S44S47, 2001
4
Slavin JL, Martini MC, Jacobs DR, Marquart L: Plausible mechanisms for the protectiveness of whole grains. Am J Clin Nutr 70 (Suppl.):459S463S, 1999
5
Bjorck I, Granfeld Y, Liljeberg H, Tovar J, Asp NG: Food properties affecting the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates. Am J Clin Nutr 59 (Suppl.):699S705S, 1994
6
Behall KM, Howe JC: Effect of long-term consumption of amylose vs amylopectin starch on metabolic variables in human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 61:334340, 1995
7
Liljeberg HGM, Akerberg AKE, Bjorck IME: Effect of the glycemic index and content of indigestible carbohydrates of cereal-based breakfast meals on glucose tolerance at lunch in healthy subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 69:647655, 1999
8
Jarui AE, Karlstrom BA, Granfeldt YE, Bjorck IE, Asp NL, Vessby BOH: Improved glycemic control and lipid profile and normalized fibrinolytic activity on a low-glycemic index diet in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 22:1018, 1999
9
Bell SJ, Forse RA: Nutritional management of hypoglycemia. Diabetes Educ 25:4147, 1999 10 Marlett JA, Slavin JL: Health implications of dietary fiberposition of the American Dietetic Association. J Am Diet Assoc 97:11571159, 1997[Medline]
11
Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, Appel LJ, Daniels SR, Deckelbaum RJ, Erdman JW, Kris-Etherton K, Goldberg IJ, Kotchen TA, Lichtenstein AH, Mitch WE, Mullis R, Robinson K, Wylie-Rosett J, St. Jeor S, Suttie J, Tribble DL, Bazzarre TL: AHA Dietary Guidelines, Revision 2000: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Circulation 102:22842299, 2000
12
Chandalia M, Garg A, Lutjohann D, Bergmann K, Grundy S, Brinkley LJ: Beneficial effects of dietary fiber intake in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 342:13921398, 2000 13 Alaimo K, McDowell MA, Briefel RR, Bischof AM, Caughman CR, Loria CM, Johnson CL: Dietary Intake of Vitamins, Minerals and Fiber of Persons Ages 2 Months and Over in the United States: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Phase 1, 1988-91. Hyattsville, Md., National Center for Health Statistics; Advanced data from vital and health statistics: No. 285, 1994 14 National Cholesterol Education Program: Second report of the expert panel on detection, evaluation, treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult treatment panel II). Circulation 89:13331445, 1994[Medline] 15 Franz MJ: Protein controversies in diabetes. Diabetes Spectrum 13:132141, 2000 16 Montgomery SJ: Vitamin E: an adjunct to diabetes management. On the Cutting Edge 22(4):2527, 2001
17
OConnell BS: Select vitamins and minerals in the management of diabetes. Diabetes Spectrum 14:133148, 2001 18 Franz MJ: Micronutrients, glucose metabolism, metabolic control and supplements. Diabetes Spectrum 11:7078, 1998 19 Dattilo AM: Micronutrients in diabetes: chromium. On the Cutting Edge 22(4):1922, 2001 20 Hunt J, Dwyer J: Position of the American Dietetic Association: Food fortification and dietary supplements. J Am Diet Assoc 101:115125, 2001[Medline]
21
Rafkin-Mervis LE, Marks JB: The science of diabetic snack bars: a review. Clinical Diabetes 19:412, 2001
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||