© American Diabetes Association ®, Inc., 2003 Tips for Running a Successful Group
In Brief Groups are a useful and common method for helping people with diabetes. Well-designed, functional groups require thoughtfulness about the institutional setting, purpose of the group, role of the leader, and recruitment of members. This article provides basic guidelines and techniques for running a successful group.
Group methods in diabetes care have often been defined in the broadest terms, encompassing many kinds of groups with goals that range from behavioral change to educational exchange. Groups are very diverse, extending from brief to long-term, meeting daily or monthly, with specific or open agendas, with a rigid membership or members coming and going, with a fee or free. With such a large variety of groups in the field, it was with some hesitation that I ventured to write guidelines that would have relevance for all groups. I focus here on groups that have a professional leader and describe broad principles and techniques adapted from group psychotherapy that would have general value for all group leaders. Groups are part of the natural process of living, like breathing, and groups for people with medical concerns have a long tradition. Phys-icians at the Asklepieion (an early version of the spa/health center) in ancient Greece and Turkey used group relationships as a treatment strategy.1 Then, the use of groups in medical settings faded until 1905, when Dr. Joseph Pratt, a Boston, Mass., physician, brought his tuberculosis patients together for weekly discussion groups and found that these meetings provided mutual support, alleviated depression, and decreased isolation.2 Groups have become a primary technique in most health care settings today because of the need for practical management of large numbers of patients, clinical efficacy, and the changes driven by insurance reimbursement.2
All groups for people with diabetes hope to alleviate illness or distress with the help of group interaction and provide the following benefits:
There are three distinct disadvantages to group methods:
A successful group requires thoughtful planning: First, clarify your own values about why you believe a group is effective and useful. Your level of enthusiasm and belief in groups will show through even if you try to keep them hidden. Second, assess the institution in which you work and determine whether it values group methods. Will the institution and your colleagues aid or undermine your attempts to start a group program? Who in your institution values or devalues groups? Who has the authority to help you start a group? What kinds of groups already exist? What kinds of patients need a group? What kind of group do they need? How will you select group members? How much competition is there among professionals for these patients? Third, be crystal-clear about the type of group you are offering. This is very important. For example, the group may be educational, supportive, therapeutic, or some combination of the three. This level of specificity will help explain the purpose of the group to potential patients and referral sources and will help define your role as the group leader. For example, in a class about insulin-to-carbohydrate ratios, the leaders primary role would be as a teacher; whereas in an insulin pump support group, the leaders role would be to help members talk to one another.
Groups are not random collections of strangers thrown together because the clinic has too few clinicians and too many patients. Hopefully, each group has a specific purpose and fulfills a specific need. Ideally, if you can match group goals with members needs, the chances are greater for a successful group. In practice, members often select themselves based on a brochure or program description, but ideally, some screening of potential group members will reduce future group problems. In general, it is important to select patients who will benefit from a group and to place them in a group from which they will benefit. Group members who see themselves as "one of a kind" in the group are at high risk of dropping out, e.g., an older woman with type 2 diabetes who finds herself in a group with young men who have type 1 diabetes. There are three reasons why patients drop out of groups:
In general, most patients can work effectively in some type of group. If patients are willing to learn, listen to others, and talk about themselves, then they are appropriate group candidates. Exclusionary criteria include refusing to abide by group guidelines and demonstrating serious problems with interpersonal relationships. Contrary to popular opinion, people who do poorly in groups are not candidates for groups. Difficult patients who are self-centered and demanding can create difficult groups and become hated group members. Volumes have been written about managing difficult patients, but it is worth mentioning one particularly constructive approach to controlling prickly situations. In essence, the leader focuses on other group members reactions to the disruptive patient rather than singling out and attacking the disruptive patient.
Some groups meet daily and even several times daily; others meet weekly or monthly. Some groups have only one meeting; others may reoccur at regular intervals. Some groups meet for only 30 minutes; others may meet for up to several hours at a time. Some groups have a predetermined and fixed number of members; others have fluctuating membership. The important point for patient benefit, regardless of time, intensity, membership, and frequency, is that patients have enough time to get their fair share of attention and do not lose contact with the purpose and process of the meeting. The important point for leaders is that the meeting not last so long that it exhausts both leader and group members. Ideally, groups should have at least four members. Smaller groups fail to provide a "hall of mirrors" effect (that is, the opportunity to see multiple aspects of yourself reflected in other people) and tempt their leaders to focus on individuals rather than on the group as a whole. How large the group becomes depends on its purpose, the leaders level of comfort with larger groups, and the point at which it becomes unmanageable and less productive. Group leaders are always responsible for arranging a comfortable, private space with enough chairs and/or tables for everyone. Scheduling and marketing are two basic but often neglected aspects of planning a group. When selecting group meeting times, leaders must be careful to avoid major religious days or civil holidays. You must also be aware of the availability of public transportation, convenient parking, and handicapped access on potential meeting days. A common experience in launching a group is that "if you build it, they will not come." Leaders must advertise group programs aggressively to colleagues (the best referral sources), local diabetes educators, clinics and hospitals, local American Diabetes Association chapters, and, of course, to potential group members. One of the most common mistakes novices make in starting a group is to expect that people will be drawn to it because of the exciting topic or the unending requests for a group. A principle that leaders must never forget is that ambivalence (especially anxiety about revealing oneself in a group) will rear its ugly head, and two-thirds of the people who said they couldnt wait to come to a group will suddenly discover that the group conflicts with their bowling night or the time they absolutely must spend reorganizing their recipes.4
The next challenge, after overcoming the hurdles of deciding the purpose of your group and recruiting members, is to show up and decide how you can best help the group. Leaders must be prepared to face several decisions:
All these leadership decisions are influenced by theoretical orientation, personality, and the context of the group. Moreover, all are a matter of degree, not all-or-nothing, and each will have consequences for the group. All of these variables may seem overwhelming, so here are 10 rules to live by so that you will not feel lost at sea in the middle of a group:
Groups are empowering vehicles and can play an important role in education and behavioral change in diabetes care. For many patients, a group format is the method of choice. For well-prepared group leaders, group interventions can be personally and professionally rewarding experiences.
John Zrebiec, MSW, CDE, is a lecturer on group psychotherapy at Harvard Medical School and associate director of the Behavioral and Mental Health Unit at the Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston, Mass.
2 Aveline MO, McCulloch DK, Tattersall RB: The practice of group psychotherapy with adult insulin-dependent diabetics. Diabet Med 2:275282, 1985[Medline] 3 Stern MJ: Group therapy with medically ill patients. In Group Therapy in Clinical Practice. Alonso A, Swiller HI, Eds. Washington, D.C., American Psychiatric Association Press, 1993, p. 185199 4 Govaerts K: Starting a support group. Diabetes Forecast, June 1991, p. 5460 5 Zrebiec JF: Group therapy. In Psychiatric Secrets. Jacobson JL, Jacobson AM, Eds. Philadelphia, Pa., Hanley & Belfus, 2001, p. 231236 This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||