© American Diabetes Association ®, Inc., 2005
Meal Planning in Groups
Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) and meal planning are an integral part of diabetes management. Diabetes MNT involves 1) assessment of a patient's nutrition knowledge and skills, 2) identification and negotiation of individually designed nutrition goals, and 3) nutrition interventions that include meal planning and other education materials to meet patients' needs.1,2 The Diabetes MNT guidelines3,4 can help patients acquire the knowledge and skills that are important for behavior change when implementing nutrition education. Group education is increasingly advocated as being as successful as, if not more successful than, individual counseling. This article discusses some of the issues involved in establishing and running group education for nutrition and meal planning.
Group classes are advantageous and have become an essential method of teaching meal planning, given the reimbursement limitations for diabetes self-management training and MNT. Group education is the standard and is required by Medicare unless barriers to learning are identified. The Federal Balanced Budget Act of 1997 resulted in changes in reimbursement by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (formerly the Health Care Financing Administration) that supported group delivery of diabetes education.5 Medicare reimburses 10 hours in the first year for initial diabetes education and 2 hours of follow-up education per year. Medicare coverage for MNT is 4 hours for the first year and 2 hours for the second.6 Group education allows for better utilization of the coverage provided by Medicare and some insurance companies.
The benefits of group education are many. It stimulates interactions among participants, which enhances learning. Many individuals with diabetes have faced the challenge of trying to follow a meal plan and make necessary changes to control blood glucose and lipids many times over. In group settings, participants have the opportunity to share these experiences and learn from others. Staffing challenges also favor group education, which provides patients with an opportunity to receive education in a timely manner. An increasing number of outcome studies have documented the advantages of diabetes group education, and it is clear that patients benefit from learning in groups.1 Adults learn best when education is interactive and personally relevant and when patients see the advantage in learning. Interactive formats are thought to be superior to lesson-style group programs because they are more effective in enhancing interaction among patients.7 Deakin et al.8 reported the results of a meta-analysis in favor of group-based diabetes education programs for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Significant improvement was seen in hemoglobin A1c (A1C; 1.4% reduction), as well as a reduction of fasting blood glucose levels, a reduction of body weight, an improvement in diabetes knowledge, a reduction of systolic blood pressure, and a reduction of medication needs. Group education can be successful, but it is beneficial to have a standardized curriculum outlining specific outcomes and behaviors targeted for change and trained educators who can facilitate learning. A few authors have reviewed the art of group education,1 but as Weinger9 points out, more studies are needed by well-trained researchers to determine the use of groups in improving diabetes self-management.
Questions to ask when developing a group education program include:
The challenges of group education include:
Ways to overcome these challenges are to get the support of administration and to assess your target population to find out what their needs are.
When initiating a group education program, it is important to create an environment that promotes trust. It is helpful to set the stage by letting participants know that all information discussed within the group is and needs to be confidential and contained within the group. This will enhance discussion and encourage participation throughout the class. There are many diabetes meal-planning approaches, and each one has its advantages and disadvantages. The most successful plan is the plan a given patient is willing and able to follow and to integrate into daily life. That said, the author has found that beginning with carbohydrate counting can be advantageous when teaching meal planning in a group setting. A group education class for meal planning might include two stages of learning. The first class should focus on the basics of healthy eating, the impact of food on blood glucose, and the role of carbohydrates. This would include teaching how to identify serving sizes of carbohydrate and label-reading skills. An interactive activity would have participants plan their own carbohydrate goals for meals and snacks. Include participants' plans for record keeping, to be used for a follow-up class to assess behavior change. Following are two meal-planning approaches that might be successfully taught during an initial session.
Basic carbohydrate counting
Plate method When deciding on the appropriate meal planning approach for group education, diabetes educators must assess the needs of their target population (Table 1). It is important to help individuals develop the skills and acquire the knowledge to follow a meal plan that best fits their lifestyle and that is one they can live with. In the end, it is the patients' choice of which behaviors to change based on their readiness to change. Dietitians and educators can only facilitate that change.
The second part of a group education program would be a follow-up class during which participants return with food and blood glucose records. Discussing these records is important to assess whether participants were able to see the impact of their food on their blood glucose and to make appropriate changes in their eating. A knowledge test in the form of a food lab can be helpful to assess knowledge from the previous class and initiate discussion about what barriers are present that prevented participants from making changes. Goals are redefined here with plans to follow up in individualized sessions to further personalize meal planning.
Group education has to be a planned process. The process should include:
As noted above, education can be delivered on a one-to-one basis or in a group, and there are also innovative techniques involving distance learning or multimedia packages. The appropriate format should be determined by patients' needs and choices. Studies have shown that to achieve best outcomes, both clinical and quality-of-life, educational interventions should:
We must assess our patients and help make learning relevant. Adult learners learn best when the information pertains to what they perceive their needs to be. Be sure to help your patients personalize their goals and plan for a follow-up evaluation and assessment.
Programs should be evaluated retrospectively for effectiveness. Evaluation is often looked at from four different levels:12
Evaluating and documenting outcomes is important to validate the effectiveness of the program in helping participants learn about diabetes and self-care skills and in maintaining participant, referrer, and educator satisfaction with the program. Building evaluation into the continuous improvement process helps to identify 1) areas of improvement, 2) areas that are working to meet the needs of the participants in a cost-effective manner, and 3) solutions to any areas that may need improvement. Properly evaluating a program requires one to think through the purposes of the program and of the evaluation, the target audiences for the results of the evaluation, the points or spans of points at which measurements will be taken, the time perspective to be employed, and the overall framework to be utilized.
Jo-Anne Rizzotto, MEd, RD, LDN, CDE, is a curriculum education specialist at the Joslin Diabetes Clinic in Boston, Mass.
2 Pastors JG,
Warshaw H, Daly A, Franz M, Kulkarni K: The evidence for the effectiveness of
medical nutrition therapy in diabetes management. Diabetes
Care 25:608
613, 2002 3 Pastors JG, Franz MJ, Warshaw H, Daly A, Arnold MS: How effective is medical nutrition therapy in diabetes care? J Am Diet Assoc103 : 827831,2003[Medline] 4 American Diabetes Association: Evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications (Position Statement). Diabetes Care 27 (Suppl. 1):S40 S46, 2002 5 Medicare Coverage Policy Decision: Duration and frequency of the medical nutrition therapy (MNT) benefit (#CAG-00097N) [article online]. Available from www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/103_cov_determ/ncd103c_part3.pdf 6 CMS Program Memorandum: Additional clarification for MNT services beneficiaries with diabetes and renal disease [document online]. Available from www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/pm_trans/ab02059.pdf 7 Mannucci E, Pala L, Rotella CM: Long-term interactive group education for type 1 diabetic patients. Acta Diabetol 42:1 6, 2005[Medline] 8 Deakin T, McShane C, Cade J, Williams R: Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev April 18: CD003417,2005
9 Weinger K: Group
interventions: emerging applications for diabetes care. Diabetes
Spectrum 16:86
87, 2003 10 Camelon KM, Hadell K, Jamsen PT, Ketonen KJ, Kohtamaki HM, Makimatilla S, Tormala ML, Valve RH: The Plate Model: a visual method of teaching meal planning. J Am Diet Assoc 98:1155 1158, 1998[Medline]
11 Ziemer DC,
Berkowitz KJ, Panayioto RM, El-Kebbi IM, Musey VC, Anderson LA, Wanko NS,
Fowke ML, Brazier CW, Dunbar VG, Slocum W, Bacha GM, Gallina DL, Cook CB,
Phillips LS: A simple meal plan emphasizing healthy food choices is as
effective as an exchange-based meal plan for urban African Americans with type
2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 26:1719
1724, 2003 12 Kirkpatrick DL: Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. 2nd ed. San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler, 1994
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||