© American Diabetes Association ®, Inc., 2005 Managing Diabetes in Correctional Facilities
In Brief Managing diabetes in correctional facilities brings challenges unique to the setting in addition to those encountered in community practice. Although national standards of care have been available to guide medical care of diabetes for many years, efforts to adapt these guidelines to the needs of correctional facilities are relatively new. This article focuses on the challenges of implementing clinical practice recommendations for diabetes in the corrections environment.
It has been estimated that at any time, 2 million people are incarcerated in prisons and jails in the United States. Nearly 80,000 of these inmates have diabetes, a prevalence of 4.8%.1 The prevalence of diabetes and its comorbidities continues to rise with the aging of the prison population. As with the general population, type 2 diabetes is increasing in younger people as a result of inactivity and obesity, both problems in inmate populations.
People with diabetes in any setting, including corrections facilities, should receive care that meets the current national standards.1,2 The unique aspects of providing care in correctional institutions must be considered in order to meet these standards. Medical care in correctional facilities is guided by the National Commission on Correctional Health Care.3 Although the commission's clinical guidelines for diabetes chronic care in correctional facilities are adapted from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) clinical practice recommendations, care in correctional facilities is not yet at the level of care recommended by the ADA. In 2004, the ADA position statement on diabetes care in correctional institutions1 was significantly revised to include far more specific recommendations for care than in the past. The recommendations now cover:
Whether prompted by continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiatives or as a result of litigation, some institutions are beginning to address the complexities of managing diabetes in their facilities. Security remains their primary focus. Offenders are given, by virtue of their offense and sentence, a security level: maximum, medium, or minimum. Additionally, they are given a medical level determined by the complexity of their medical needs. The combination of these factors determines their final facility placement. But while facilities within the same system (for example, a state department of corrections) include all of the above security levels and medical levels, each facility may operate as a separate entity with its own rules of operation. Two important aspects of improving care for inmates with diabetes are 1) the development of clear policies and procedures based on ADA clinical practice recommendations (Tables 1 and 2) addressing the security level within each facility. It is important that these policies and procedures are consistent throughout the facilities within the entire organization. Once adopted, they should be used to develop training curricula and competencies for both the corrections and medical staff that are appropriate to job classification and responsibilities.
The following barriers to quality diabetes care were directly observed in facilities or identified by nurse managers of all facilities in a state department of corrections during a training program.
Care Delivery Systems
Prison Culture
Budget Constraints
Nursing Staff Recruitment and Retention
Nutrition Food is generally purchased in bulk and prepared and served by inmates. Many organizations are now focusing more on heart healthy selections. This may, however, affect the cost of food services as well. It is important that all individuals involved with food preparation and service be taught the principles of good nutrition and communication and how to help monitor the food intake of the inmates, thus supporting inmates learning about their own nutritional needs.5 Individual nutrition assessment and meal plan design by a registered dietitian (RD) who is experienced in working with people who have diabetes is the accepted standard of care.1 Many organizations do not employ an RD with these skills. In fact, there may be only one dietitian for the entire corrections system. In such a situation, individual counseling regarding healthy eating is less likely to occur.
Medication Lines One of the difficulties observed is that when inmates with diabetes, type 1 or type 2, require an evening dose of insulin, the injection time can be as early as 4:30 p.m. The timing of this evening dose may be problematic for many, contributing to hypoglycemia during the night and hyperglycemia by the next morning. It is important that the medical staff understand the action times of the diabetes medications and insulins in order to plan for optimal dose timing.
Exercise
Appropriate Security and Disposal of Sharps
Work Groups
Canteen Purchases
Lock-Downs When a lock-down occurs, those within the locked area do not go to meals, medication lines, or any other activity that may be scheduled during that time. This obviously creates problems for those with diabetes. "Head counts" are a routine occurrence during which all inmates must be in their cells and counted. These usually occur a certain number of times each day and take precedence over the timing of medication lines and meals.
Transfers Temporary transfers may be more difficult. For example, if an offender is temporarily held in a county jail while appearing in court, medical resources may not be as available as in a permanent facility. This situation also presents challenges in communicating the medical needs of the individual inmate to the jail authorities.
Offender Issues The inmate culture has long been one of competing for power and status. Theft of coveted personal items is common. For instance, athletic shoes can be purchased in the canteen but are frequently stolen as a sort of status symbol. Even if athletic shoes are ordered for inmates with diabetes who also have neuropathy, they are subject to theft. The staff cites many instances in which inmates have become adept at manipulating the system and the staff in order to gain an advantage over staff or other inmates. Because of recent successes of inmates or groups of inmates bringing lawsuits against corrections organizations for a variety of civil rights issues, it has become common for inmates to threaten staff with litigation. Threats of litigation by inmates can perpetuate a hostile or confrontational atmosphere for both parties.
Staff Perceptions One frequently heard comment is that "their diabetes is in much better control now than when they arrived." This may indeed be true, and at the same time, it is important to acknowledge that as health care professionals, it is our responsibility to provide care that meets recognized standards, regardless of the setting in which we work. Many of the challenges experienced by health professionals in managing diabetes are attributed to patient "noncompliance." This is not unique to the corrections environment. Assuming noncompliance becomes a barrier to good care when it limits the assessment of causes of the behavior in question. Any one or a combination of the above barriers could give the appearance and the same result as willful disobedience. Medical professionals may or may not have current knowledge of the clinical practice recommendations for diabetes. The science of diabetes management, including the pharmaceutical and technical tools, changes continuously. Additionally, new evidence for the efficacy of various behavior change interventions can teach us how to augment the effects of diabetes management plans. Ongoing education in both areas is important to maintain competence as well as facilitate solutions to the barriers to appropriate care that may be identified in the process of delivering care to patients. Diabetes experts, including physicians, registered nurses (RNs), and RDs, preferably those who are certified diabetes educators, if available, are used as consultants or outside referrals for diabetes-related patient problems.
Other Health Issues
CQI Programs The standards provided by the National Commission for Correctional Health Care include quality monitors. While many organizations address these monitors with policies and procedures, others are beginning to address quality outcomes measures with methods being used by managed care organizations in the community. Diabetes quality-of-care initiatives can and should be included in the overall CQI program.6 This can take many forms, depending on the processes used by the organization. Generally, the steps involved are:
Suppose, for example, that there is concern about the number of hospitalizations within the past year. This concern may be prompted by the costs incurred by these hospitalizations, which can account for nearly 50% of the total cost of diabetes care in some health maintenance organization populations.7 A summary report of the hospital utilization data should include admitting diagnoses, lengths of stay, discharge diagnoses, complications encountered, emergency department visits, ambulance costs, and other information. Evaluating such a report is likely to raise a number of important questions. How many of the admissions were related to serious episodes in the prison? How many admissions and emergency visits were avoidable? What was the most frequent cause of admission? Chart review may be needed to find answers to one or more of these questions. Addressing avoidable hospital admissions can be an effort well spent to reduce costs significantly while improving quality of care.
Population Management Components of successful diabetes disease management programs include:
Population management is more common in managed care organizations because the members of the population are identifiable. Correctional medicine is a managed care system of health care, with a network of contracted providers and hospitals. The population is "enclosed," literally. Proactive health management, however, is a relatively new concept. The potential to improve quality while reducing costs to the payer (usually the taxpayer) is a strong argument for exploring population management as a means of meeting ADA clinical practice recommendations for diabetes.7 In population management efforts, registries are used to identify the status of current care for the population. For example, process measures include the percentage of patients who have hemoglobin A1c measurements, lipid panels, serum creatinine measurement, urine microalbumin tests, dilated eye exams, and other key assessments performed within the past year. Outcome measures aggregate the results of those measures and ideally reflect the percentage of those in and out of target ranges for each measure. Once this information is known, the quality improvement team can begin to identify the gaps in care, establish goals, identify possible causes and solutions, and measure results.
Care Management Care managers also typically provide outreach to those who have avoided or dropped out of care to assure that the standards of care are met.
Training for Corrections and Medical Staff All staff should receive general education about diabetes provided in lay language. The curriculum should focus on:
This education should be provided with orientation and reviewed annually thereafter. Provider education, as previously discussed, should focus on the standards of care. Use of flow sheets, paper or electronic, are especially helpful in prompting identification of gaps in meeting the standards of care. Additional training in medication management of diabetes, specific to both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, is also valuable. This may be accomplished through real case discussion with an expert diabetes consultant. Nursing education can contribute significantly to improved quality and continuity of care. Education specific to the nurse's role and responsibilities should begin with demonstration of basic diabetes competencies, validated on a regular basis. Additional training in case management, behavior change strategies, nursing assessment of diabetes control, basic nutrition goals, and problem-solving promotes effective communications and continuity of care.9
DSME for Inmates
Prevention
At best, diabetes is a complex chronic disease that is challenging to manage well even in communities offering many health care resources to support quality care. In correctional facilities, additional challenges and barriers exist that stretch the medical resources and invite collaboration with the diabetes community. It is encouraging to work with competent, dedicated professionals who are experienced in correctional medicine. Diabetes consultants should listen to these professionals carefully to fully understand the environment in which they function. They should also focus on the standards of care and implications of various treatment plan requirements, help identify barriers to effective care, and facilitate internal discussions that seek to overcome the barriers. Diabetes consultants who are also knowledgeable about health care system design can be especially valuable in supporting the development of a care delivery infrastructure that reduces barriers and optimizes available resources. Although litigation is frequently the precipitating event that prompts efforts to improve quality of care for people with diabetes in correctional facilities, mandated solutions are not likely to promote effective and lasting change. Mutual respect of both corrections and diabetes expertise is much more likely to develop solutions to the problems that are as unique as the setting itself.
Linda L. Edwards, RN, MHS, CDE, is the diabetes education coordinator at Kaiser Permanente in Colorado and a court-ordered consultant to the Colorado Department of Corrections.
2 American Diabetes Association: Standards
of medical care in diabetes (Position Statement). Diabetes
Care 28 (Suppl. 1):S4
S36, 2005 3 National Commission on Correctional Health Care: Diabetes chronic care. In Clinical Guideline for Correctional Facilities. Chicago, National Commission of Correctional Health Care, 2001, p. 19. Available online at http://www.ncchc.org/clinical_guidelines/diabetes.pdf 4 American Diabetes Association: Nutrition principles and recommendations in diabetes (Position Statement). Diabetes Care 27 (Suppl. 1):S36 S40, 2004 5 Puisis M, Robertson JM: Chronic disease management. In Clinical Practice in Correctional Medicine. Puisis M, Ed. St. Louis, Mo., Mosby,1998 , p. 5165 6 Greifinger RB, Horn M: Quality improvement through care management. In Clinical Practice in Correctional Medicine. Puisis M, Ed. St. Louis, Mo., Mosby, 1998, p.317 325
7 Rubin RJ, Dietrich
KA, Hawk AD: Clinical and economic impact of implementing a comprehensive
diabetes management program in managed care. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 83:2635
2642, 1998
8 Sadur CN, Moline
N, Costa M, Michalik D, Mendlowitz S, Roller S, Watson S, Swain BE, Selby JV,
Javorski WC: Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization:
efficacy of care management using cluster visits. Diabetes
Care 22:2011
2017, 1999 9 Edwards LL: Phased competency: a new model to prepare nurses for enhanced roles in diabetes disease management. Dis Manag Health Outcomes5 : 253261,1999
10 American Diabetes Association: National
standards for diabetes self-management education (Position Statement).
Diabetes Care 28 (Suppl. 1):S72
S79, 2005 11 May JP, Lambert WE: Preventive health issues for individuals in jails and prisons. In Clinical Practice in Correctional Medicine. Puisis M, Ed. St. Louis, Mo., Mosby, 1998, p.259 260
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||