© American Diabetes Association ®, Inc., 2005 Unique Challenges for Pediatric Patients With Diabetes
In Brief This article identifies many of the special challenges encountered by anyone caring for and managing children and adolescents with diabetes. It uses a case study methodology to provide tools to clarify and explore developmental considerations and contributing factors for this population.
The needs of pediatric patients dictate guidelines for care that are different from those for adults. The American Diabetes Association recently published a statement on current standards of care pertaining to children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.1 In accordance with this, members of diabetes teams have become more aggressive in identifying goals and negotiating plans with families to meet standards and target hemoglobin A1c (A1C) levels. Treatment plans are sometimes successful, but often they fall short because of multiple factors. These challenges require deeper exploration to identify sources of barriers to treatment and more effective strategies for motivation and behavior change. Factors that contribute to pediatric challenges include normal growth and development, psychological characteristics, health status, family dynamics (including socioeconomic status and cultural considerations), and care outside of the home, such as in the school setting. These components increase the intricacy of caring for pediatric patients in general, and the addition of a chronic condition often further increases the complexity. The purpose of this article is to identify some of the special challenges encountered by anyone caring for and managing children and adolescents with diabetes and how these issues are influenced by contributing factors.
Normal Growth and Development Normal growth and development affects every aspect of diabetes care and forms a framework for managing care at different ages, as seen in Table 1.211 The family's interpretation or expectation of developmental tasks and abilities of children and adolescents also contributes to pediatric challenges, as well as the health team's ability to promote anticipatory guidance in these areas.
Childhood is a time of rapid growth and organ maturation. For diabetes, this relates to continual changes of insulin doses and assessment of how insulin is used in the body. The goal of achieving normal puberty is also important. Insulin resistance occurs during puberty, with overall insulin response 2530% lower in pubertal children than in prepubertal children.12,13 Cognitive changes affect care as children's ability to understand, verbalize thoughts, and learn new information evolves. Hypoglycemia is a major concern in diabetes, particularly as it relates to potential adverse effects on the brain. Target glucose levels may be higher in young children to counterbalance hypoglycemia. Many studies show that hypoglycemia is particularly detrimental to the developing brain of young children.14,15 That is why methods to prevent hypoglycemic events are crucial; such events have a widespread psychological effect on the family's ability to keep blood glucose levels in target. Children assume increased responsibility with age. Anderson et al.16 have found that parents and children often do not communicate about how diabetes responsibilities are shared or about expectations. Therefore, it is helpful for the diabetes team to identify the tasks of diabetes care and who takes responsibility for them, pinpoint tasks for which no one is taking responsibility, and facilitate discussion of these issues. Transition of care from parent to child should be initiated gradually starting in middle school, allowing for continued success and supervision by parents. Autonomy can be fostered as children mature, understand more, become more manually dexterous, and gain the confidence necessary to implement more of their treatment program for themselves. Because young people live for the moment and a great deal of energy is required to face long-term goals, short-term goals are often more attainable, and multiple successes build positive habits. Preparation for college can create concern and anxiety, so creating a plan of action with the parent and young adult can increase readiness for this important period of growth and development.17
Psychological Characteristics Psychological factors have been shown to increase risks of poor glycemic control. Leichter et al.19 identified pediatric examples including unresolved feelings over parental divorce, anger over relationship with stepfather, childhood molestation, child abuse, and parental conflict over diabetes care. Kovacs et al.20 assessed school-age children over the first 6 years of their diagnosis and found a mild increase in depressive symptoms after the first year. Anxiety decreased for boys but increased for girls over time. The degree to which children were upset by the diabetes regimen related to anxiety and depression. Higher A1C levels in adolescents have been associated with depressive symptoms, suggesting the importance of early diagnosis and treatment.21 Clinicians ideally should consult with a mental health professional for screening patients and should develop a network of referral sources who are knowledgeable about diabetes.
Health Status
Family Dynamics Parents report letting go of perfectionism and keeping a positive attitude as positive coping strategies.2729 Strong positive connections with knowledgeable and skilled professionals are also helpful to promote clinic visits, which have been shown to decrease with single-parent households and to affect control.30
Care Outside of the Home
Challenges in Pediatric Diabetes Management
Case Study 1: Ana Ana is a 2-year-old who was recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. She is a very spirited toddler, and she fights blood glucose testing by screaming, hiding, and clenching her fists. How can the educator help the family with this challenge?
Solution. At age 2, Ana's initial judgment about blood glucose testing is based on personal preference, and this does not include invasive procedures. At this age, it is not possible to convince Ana that she needs to test her blood glucose. The clear responsibility for making sure that blood glucose testing is completed at necessary times belongs to the parents. There is a danger that the child's illness will alter the parental role. With the assistance of Ana's father, her mother was able to model a matter-of-fact attitude and stick to the necessary routine. She provided immediate and concrete incentives, such as a hug, telling Ana she did a good job, and letting her pick out a book to read. Within a very short period of time, Ana was willingly presenting her finger to her parents and allowing her blood glucose to be tested. Additionally, the diabetes team picked the diabetes supplies that would work best for this family, including a meter that was capable of alternate site testing, required a very small sample, and gave results in 5 seconds. The smallest-gauge lancet was also used.
Case Study 2: Terrel
Solution. At age 4, Terrel likes to help, wants to do things by himself, and adapts well to routines. He is able to understand the meaning of low blood glucose and the importance of eating his carbohydrates. In the school setting, he needs to be supervised while at the same time learning to take some responsibility for his blood glucose levels. Incentives that work at this age include praise, stickers, and providing choices. The diabetes educator met with the school nurse and Terrel's teacher. They developed a care plan that included sitting down with Terrel and explaining that they were going to help him not have low blood glucose at school. Every day before recess, he would get to choose one of two gluten-free snacks provided by his mother. When he finished the snack, Terrel could pick a small prize from a treasure chest in the school nurse's office. Terrel liked being involved. Because he got to choose the snack, he was more inclined to eat it, and getting a prize when he finished eating was an extra incentive. Before long this routine became the norm, and the hypoglycemia disappeared.
Case Study 3: Rachel Rachel is very good with video games, so she was able to learn the technical aspects of the pump very quickly. Because Rachel's mother is unsure of herself with electronic devices, she has allowed Rachel to do the hands-on portion of pump care. Recently, Rachel made a mistake while giving insulin at school and double-bolused, resulting in a severe low glucose event. Glucagon was given by the nurse who was on campus that day. This mistake produced a great deal of anxiety, and Rachel had difficulty returning to school after the incident. Again, how can the diabetes team work with the school and the family to identify the factors contributing to this challenge and make a developmentally appropriate plan?
Solution. Although Rachel, at age 10, is able to master the technical aspects of the pump, she does not yet have the emotional maturity to be given total responsibility for it. Rachel's mother allowed her to take more responsibility than she was ready for. Rachel very much wants acceptance by her peers. The kids at school thought it was cool that she had the pump, and Rachel enjoyed the attention she got when she gave a bolus. She was able to understand the consequences of her actions and was very frightened when she realized that she had made a mistake. She lost confidence in her ability and felt she had lost face with her friends. The team brought Rachel and her mother in for an intense clinic visit. Developmental milestones were explained to them, and a contract was developed around responsibility for the pump. Rachel's mother agreed to do all hand-on pump programming when Rachel was at home until she was very comfortable with all aspects of the pump. After that, Rachel could again assist, but always with someone double-checking. It was agreed that at school Rachel would program the pump only with supervision by an adult and not as a social activity around her friends. Because the nurse was only on campus 2 days a week, she arranged for a designated adult to double-check Rachel's entries. This person was also trained on glucagon administration for back-up if the nurse was not on campus on a day it was needed. The designated office person was very supportive and encouraging, and this reinforced Rachel's sense of self. Rachel was excited about the suggestion of going to diabetes camp, where she would meet other children with diabetes using insulin pumps. Additional recommendations included upgrading Rachel to one of the new "smart pumps." These devices include a calculation algorithm and "active insulin" or "insulin on board" features that simplify insulin delivery with the pump and decrease the risk of error.
Case Study 4: Jose He was recently hospitalized for the third time in the past 12 months for DKA resulting from not taking his insulin. This time, he required intensive care monitoring because of a very low pH and depressed level of consciousness. When asked later why he stopped taking insulin, he said he was angry with his mother and did it to get back at her. What is the best plan using contributing and developmental factors for Jose?
Solution. At almost 17, Jose is physically able to carry out all of the technical tasks of diabetes management. But he needs family support to cope with the emotional burden of a chronic illness. Although Jose understands the causes and effects of not taking his insulin, he is using this knowledge as a weapon against his mother. He is recklessly involved in risk-taking behaviors and putting himself in jeopardy. During the recent hospitalization, his diabetes educator and social worker met with him and his mother. A report to the Department of Children and Family Services was made because of the severity of his condition and the number of recurring episodes of DKA. Both Jose and his mother recognized the seriousness of this admission. On deeper exploration, Jose admitted he was angry at his mother because she wasn't home and depressed because he has no quality time with his mother and has not seen is father in several years. The mother verbalized her constant worry about Jose's condition and the family's financial stress requiring her to work nights. Both Jose and his mother were willing to make small steps toward improving his control and preventing subsequent DKA. They were involved in developing a plan of care that included:
Case Study 5: Loretta Loretta lives with her mother and father and her maternal grandmother, who does the cooking. There is a strong family history of type 2 diabetes, and Loretta's paternal grandfather died of diabetes-related complications 2 years ago. All family members are heavy smokers, and Loretta has recently begun smoking. Loretta was very angry about the diagnosis and stated that there was no way she would test her blood glucose at school. Additionally, she said it didn't matter what she did because she would end up dying anyway. What is the plan and contributing factors for Loretta?
Solution. Loretta's reaction is common for a 13-year-old who wants to be accepted by her friends and live in the here and now. She is old enough to see cause and effect and can relate her diagnosis to the poor health of her relatives with diabetes, which creates her sense of learned helplessness and fatalism. Any solution is going to need to counteract this belief system, so frequent team visits coordinating small steps in the right direction will be necessary for Loretta. She came into the outpatient education center for new-onset education with her mother and grandmother and met with the diabetes educator, nutritionist, and social worker. The education session was kept short but concentrated on how lower glucose values positively affect health. She was started on metformin. Her grandmother was also on metformin, and the team was able to set up a buddy system for taking the medication and blood glucose testing at home before breakfast, dinner, and bedtime. There was a compromise with Loretta at this point to not test her blood glucose at school while she was getting used to the routine. The meeting with the nutritionist focused on how Loretta's grandmother could start making healthier food choices, especially related to the amount of sugar and fat in their family recipes. A referral to the hospital's weight management program was made for the summer session to give Loretta a few months to adjust to the diagnosis and new treatment routines. The entire family agreed to go to a smoking cessation clinic.
These case studies demonstrate how coordinating care for children can differ greatly from coordinating care for adults. They also illustrate the importance of considering the normative developmental issues of children and how diabetes management is affected by these factors. Tables 1 and 2 can be used prescriptively to identify potential pediatric challenges and to derive solutions throughout childhood and adolescence. Although much information can be generated using this process, it is important to work collaboratively with patients and their families to prioritize education and treatment options. In so doing, positive behavior changes can be broken down into small manageable steps to promote more consistent and ongoing success.
Mary Halvorson, RN, MSN, CDE, is an assistant professor of clinical pediatrics, and Kevin Kaiserman, MD, is a clinical associate professor of pediatrics at the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. Ms. Halvorson is also director of research and development, Patrice Yasuda, PhD, is a psychologist, and Sue Carpenter, RN, BA, CDE, is a clinical manager for endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles. Dr. Kaiserman is also an endocrinologist and director of diabetes at the same institution.
2 Piaget J: The Origins of Intelligence in Children. Cook M, Ed. New York, W.W. Norton, 1952 3 Piaget J: Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York, W.W. Norton, 1951 4 Piaget J, Inyhelder B: The Psychology of the Child. New York, Basic Books, 1969 5 Ginsburg H, Opper S: Piaget's Theory of Intellectual Development. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1969 6 Wadsworth B: Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development: An Introduction for Students of Psychology and Education. New York, Longman,1979 7 Hoffman MI, Hoffman LW: Development of moral character and moral ideology. In Review of Child Development Research. Kohlberg L, Ed. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1964, p.13 57 8 Erikson EH, Klein GS (Eds.): Identity and the Life Cycle. New York, International Press, 1959 9 Parker S, Zuckerman B: Behavioral and Developmental Pediatrics. Boston, Little Brown, 1995 10 Dixon S, Stein M: Encounters With Children: Pediatric Behavior and Development. Chicago, New Book Medical Publishers,1987 11 Roberts M (Ed.): Handbook of Pediatric Psychology. 2nd ed. New York, Guilford Press, 1995 12 Amiel SA, Sherwin R, Simonson D, Lauritano A, Tamborlane W: Impaired insulin action in puberty: a contributing factor to poor glycemic control in adolescents with diabetes. N Engl J Med 315:215 219, 1986[Abstract]
13 Palmer D, Berg C,
Wiebe D, Beveridge R, Korbel C, Upchurch R, Swinyard M, Lindsay R, Donaldson
D: Role of autonomy and pubertal status in understanding age differences in
maternal involvement in diabetes responsibility across adolescence.
J Pediatr Psychol 29:35
46, 2004 14 Desrocher M, Rovet J: Neurocognitive correlation of type 1 diabetes mellitus in childhood. Neuropsychol Dev 10:36 52, 2004 15 Rovet J, Ehrlich R: The effect of hypoglycemic seizures on cognitive function in children with diabetes: a seven-year prospective study. J Pediatr1 : 352354,1999 16 Anderson BJ, Auslander W, Jung K, Miller J, Santiago J: Assessing family sharing of diabetes responsibilities. J Pediatr Psych15 : 477492,1990 17 Gilliland A, Siminerio L: Getting ready for college. Diabetes Self-Mgt 19:88 96, 2002 18 Grey M: Psychosocial status of children with diabetes in the first two years after diagnosis. Diabetes Care 16:1330 1336, 1995
19 Leichter S,
Dreelin E, Moore S: Integration of clinical psychology in the comprehensive
diabetes care team. Clin Diabetes22
: 129131,2004
20 Kovacs M, Iyengar
S, Goldston D, Stewart J, Obrosky JS: Psychological functioning of children
with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a longitudinal study. J
Pediatr Psychol 15:619
632, 1990 21 Whittemore R, Kanner S, Singleton S, Hamrin V, Chiu J, Grey M: Correlates of depressive symptoms in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 3:135 143, 2002[Medline]
22 Book L: Diagnosing
celiac disease in 2002: who, why and how? Pediatrics109
: 952954,2002
23 Dietz W: Health
consequences of obesity in youth: childhood predictors of adult disease.
Pediatrics 101:518
525, 1998
24 Madden P: From
Research to Practice: Children and Families Living With Diabetes: Preface.
Diabetes Spectrum 17:18
21, 2004 25 Atkinson DR (Ed.): Counseling American Minorities, 6th ed. NewYork, McGraw-Hill, 2004 26 Dumont RH, Jacobson AM, Cole C, Hauser ST, Woldsdorf JI, Willett JE, Milley JE, Wertlieb D: Psychosocial predictors of acute complications of diabetes in youth. Diabet Med 12:612 618, 1995[Medline]
27 Mellin A,
Neumark-Sztainer D, Patterson J: Parenting adolescent girls with type 1
diabetes: parents' perspectives. J Pediatr Psychol29
: 221230,2004 28 Anderson BJ, Miler JP, Auslander WF, Santiago JV: Family characteristics of diabetic adolescents: relationship to metabolic control. Diabetes Care4 : 586594,1981[Abstract] 29 Johnson G, Kent G, Leather J: Strengthening the parent-child relationship: a review of family interventions and their use in medical settings. Child Care, Health Dev 31:25 32, 2005[Medline]
30 Kaufman FR,
Halvorson M, Carpenter S: Association between diabetes control and visits to a
multidisciplinary pediatric diabetes clinic.
Pediatrics 103:948
951, 1999
31 American Diabetes Association: Clinical
Practice Recommendations 2005. Diabetes Care28
(Suppl. 1): S1S79,2005
32 Kaufman FR:
Diabetes at school: what a child's health care team needs to know about
federal disability law. Clin Diabetes20
: 9192,2002
33 La Greca A: Issues
in adherence with pediatric regimens. J Pediatr
Psychol 15:423
579, 1990 34 Funnell M, Siminerio L: Diabetes education: overcoming affective roadblocks. Diabetes Voice 49:22 23, 2004
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||